Talk about “chip diplomacy” continues to focus on potential flashpoints such as Taiwan. Despite this, operations in Armenia are increasingly offering a model for smaller states to make their influence felt in this new dimension of international politics.
June 11, 2026 - Arman Aleksanian - Articles and Commentary
Flag of Armenia made out of code / Shutterstock
One of the most consequential shifts in American foreign policy has nothing to do with a treaty or a summit. It has to do with a semiconductor.
Over the past two years, the United States has attempted to reshape the global balance of technological power through export controls, licencing regimes, and selective access to advanced AI chips. The policy has drawn criticism from all sides. Some argue that even restricted chip sales to China accelerate a strategic competitor. Others say the controls are too blunt, punishing allies and distorting markets without achieving their stated goals. Approvals have slowed, conditions have shifted, and what initially appeared to be a coherent doctrine has often looked more like improvisation.
But beneath the debate over export controls, something more fundamental is taking shape. In an era defined by artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and data infrastructure, geopolitical influence is increasingly exercised not through alliances alone, but through control over compute: who has it, where it is located, and who is allowed to use it.
Much of the discussion has focused on China. But this emerging “chip diplomacy” may lie elsewhere – in a small, but strategically positioned country on the edge of Europe and the Middle East.
That is what is happening in Armenia right now. Not as an experiment but as an operational reality.
The urgency of this shift is becoming impossible to ignore. The expanding conflict involving Iran has demonstrated how quickly regional instability can cascade beyond energy markets into the infrastructure that powers the modern economy. The Strait of Hormuz is emerging as a direct risk not only to oil but to the semiconductor ecosystem itself. Chip production depends on stable energy, complex logistics, and constrained inputs like helium, all exposed to chokepoint disruption. A regional crisis can become a global compute constraint within weeks.
Now consider a more consequential shock: a disruption to Taiwan. The island produces the overwhelming majority of the world’s most advanced semiconductors. Any interruption there would not merely raise prices. It would paralyze entire sectors of the global economy.
In that world, the central question would not be where chips are manufactured, but where compute capacity and secure processing environments can be rapidly scaled. Geography is being revalued. This is true regarding not just where chips are made, but where resilient compute infrastructure can operate outside the most exposed corridors.
This is where Armenia enters the picture. Not as a theoretical possibility, but as a functioning answer.
Armenia will not become a semiconductor manufacturer. That is not the role it needs to play. In a more fragmented world, value is shifting toward a distributed network of trusted, politically aligned nodes: countries that can host compute infrastructure, attract engineering talent, and operate within a secure strategic framework.
Armenia has structural advantages for this role. It is broadly aligned with the West, even as it navigates a difficult neighbourhood. It has a deep pool of technical talent, reinforced by a global diaspora. Its IT sector has grown rapidly, producing globally recognized companies like Picsart and ServiceTitan. The sector now accounts for a meaningful share of national output in a country of fewer than three million people.
What has changed is that these advantages have moved from potential to deployment.
At Eleveight AI, we have built and are now operating the first NVIDIA Blackwell B300 GPU infrastructure in the Caucasus region. It is comprised of 512 of the world’s most advanced AI accelerators, installed, powered, cooled, and running production workloads in Gagarin, Armenia, built to NVIDIA Reference Architecture standards.
We are not alone. Yerevan State University has deployed its own NVIDIA GPU research system. The Firebird AI initiative is developing a large-scale computing project that could bring tens of thousands of additional GPUs to the country. The Armenian government has articulated a national vision it calls a “Garden of AI Factories”, a coordinated strategy to make the country a competitive hub for AI research and deployment.
This is not one company making a bet. This is a national compute ecosystem taking shape, with operational infrastructure already in the ground.
🎙️ Listen to the latest Talk Eastern Europe podcast episode:
The standard framing for stories like this is cautious. A small country makes an ambitious bet. Maybe it works, maybe it does not.
I want to push back on that framing. The question is no longer whether a country like Armenia can host advanced AI infrastructure. We have answered that. The hardware is running. International demand is real and growing.
The more important question is whether the model can be replicated. Can the combination of US diplomatic support, advanced hardware access, local talent, and private-sector execution create a repeatable blueprint for building resilient compute capacity in strategically important but underserved regions?
I believe it can. And Armenia is the first proof point.
What makes this work is the alignment of several factors: a government that has made AI infrastructure a national priority, a talent base with genuine depth in mathematics and engineering, a diaspora that provides capital and connections, energy costs that support high-density computing, a climate that enables efficient cooling, and a regulatory environment adapting to attract global investment. The speed at which these have converged, combined with deployed infrastructure, makes Armenia the most advanced example of what chip diplomacy can produce when it moves beyond export controls and into partnership.
Armenia’s borders remain complex. Its conflict with Azerbaijan is unresolved. Regional security risks are real. These are not factors to dismiss. But they underscore the argument: if resilient AI infrastructure can be built and operated successfully in this geography, the model becomes far more compelling for other nations facing similar constraints.
At Eleveight AI, our ambition extends beyond the Caucasus. The demand we are seeing from international technology firms, from enterprises in the Middle East, from research institutions in Europe, tells us that the market for sovereign, locally controlled, high-performance AI compute is not a niche. It is the next major infrastructure cycle.
The United States has the most powerful chip technology in the world. But technology alone does not create strategic advantage. What creates advantage is where that technology is deployed, who operates it, and whether the resulting infrastructure can withstand the shocks that are coming.
Chip diplomacy, if it is to be more than a slogan, needs operational proof points. Not announcements. Not memorandums. Facilities with power flowing through them, GPUs processing workloads, and engineers on site at three in the morning solving problems that cannot wait for a support ticket.
That is what we have built. And it is what Armenia, as a country, is building.
The semiconductor may be the 21st century’s most important strategic asset. But the real question is not who makes it. It is who has the vision, the partnerships, and the execution to put it to work in the places where it matters most.
Armenia is answering that question. Not with a proposal but with proof.
Arman Aleksanian is the Co-founder and CEO of Eleveight AI, Armenia’s first operational NVIDIA Blackwell B300 AI data centre, located in the settlement of Gagarin.
New Eastern Europe is reader-supported. If you value independent coverage of Central and Eastern Europe, please consider supporting our work. 👉 Click here to donate.
AI, Armenia, IT sector, South Caucasus, technology
March 25, 2025 - Suzanna Shamakhyan - Articles and Commentary
March 14, 2025 - Valerii Pekar - Articles and Commentary
November 20, 2023 - Vladyslav Faraponov - Hot TopicsIssue 6 2023Magazine
The consequences of Russia’s invasion are visible not only in Ukraine. The Kremlin has set off or exploited a series of crises that face most European countries.
New thinking is needed in policies towards Russia, in whatever form it will take after the war.
Ukraine’s suffering goes well beyond the front line.
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine we now see our western values under siege, whether we consciously recognise it or not.
The invasion by Russian forces of Ukraine from the north, south and east – with the initial aim to take the capital Kyiv – has changed our region, and indeed our world, forever.
The situation with Russian threats towards Ukraine once again illustrates the high level of instability in our region.
Only a year ago we witnessed the second Nagorno-Karabakh war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. It took at least 5,000 lives and significantly shifted the geopolitics in the South Caucuses.
This special issue aims to honour the plight of Belarusians whose democratic choice made in August 2020 was shamelessly snubbed by Alyaksandr Lukashenka.
From the social, economic and political points of view, a lot of work still remains for this country. And this is why Ukraine’s story is incomplete.
Our societies are more polarised than ever before, which makes them more susceptible to disinformation, untruth and conspiracy theories.
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed limitations and weaknesses in nearly all countries around the world.
Its costs, challenges and the commitment to peace.
Uncertainty, volatility and the relationship between Russia and the West.
The Black Sea region is quickly becoming a geopolitical battleground which is gaining the interest of major powers, regional players and smaller countries – and the stakes are only getting higher.
This issue is dedicated to the 10 year anniversary of the European Union’s Eastern Partnership as well as the 30 years since the 1989 revolutions in Central Europe.
The consequences of the emerging multipolar world.
This issue takes a special look at the role and responsibility of the public intellectual in Central and Eastern Europe today.
In the eastern parts of the European continent, 1918 is remembered not only as the end of the First World War, but also saw the emergence of newly-independent states and the rise of geopolitical struggles which are felt until this day.
It often seems, at least from the outside, that Belarus remains isolated from the West and very static in its transformation. Yet, despite its relative isolation, Belarus is indeed changing.
The Summer 2018 issue of New Eastern Europe tackles the complexity of para-states in the post-Soviet space.